THIS IS WHY MAHATMA GANDHI FORGAVE GENERAL DYER EVEN AFTER JALLIANWALA BAGH MASSACRE.

Ironically, it was Gandhi who coined the term 'Dyerism' to describe brute force and violent suppression. Brigadier General Dyer, the chief perpetrator of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, was an object of hate among Indians, but Mahatma Gandhi forgave General Dyer again and again, even as he warned people against 'Dyerism'. At that time, Mahatma Gandhi was trying to show the country a different path - a path of non-violence and forgiveness. Gandhi said that "it would be sin for me to serve General Dyer and cooperate with him to shoot innocent men. But it will be an exercise of forgiveness or love for me to nurse him back to life, if he was suffering from a physical malady". [Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi (CWMG) Vol. 18, p. 195, 'Religious Authority for Non-Cooperation', Young India, 25th August, 1920]. 
Gandhi even wrote that Dyer 'merely destroyed a few bodies but the others tried to kill the soul of a nation'. He said that "the fury that has been spent upon General Dyer is, I am sure, largely misdirected". [CWMG, Vol. 18, p. 46, Young India, 14th July, 1920].
When Dyer suffered from paralysis in the last phase of his life, a friend wrote to Gandhi blaming the Jallianwala Bagh massacre for his ill-health. Gandhi, a staunch believer of Bhagavad Gita, had a rational response to this. "I do not think that his paralysis has any necessary connection with his action in Jallianwala Bagh. Have you considered the implications of such beliefs?...My dysentry, appendicitis and this time a mild attack of paralysis must have been known to you. I should be very sorry if some good Englishmen were to think that these diseases were due to my fierce opposition as it must appear in their estimation, to the English Government".{CWMG Vol. 34, p. 229, 'A Letter', 24th July, 1927}.
Then he forgave Dyer again, nearly two decades after the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. "Who could be more cruel or blood-thirsty than the Late General Dyer?" asked Gandhi, "Yet the Jallianwala Bagh Congress Inquiry Committee, on my advice, had refused to ask for his prosecution. I had no trace of ill-will against him in my heart. I would have also liked to meet him personally and reach his heart, but that was to remain a mere aspiration". [CWMG Vol. 68, p. 83, 'Talk to Kudai Khidmatgars', 01st Movember, 1938].  
Forgive but don't Forget: While Gandhi forgave Dyer, he clarified that 'absence of hatred does not and must not mean the screening of the guilty".[CWMG, Vol. 30, p. 442, 'To S.L.R. Young India', 13th May, 1926]. "Though we do speak of forgetting and forgiving the misdeeds of others, it would be a sin to forget certain things". Talking about Dyer and O'Dwyer (the Lt. Governor of Punjab during the Jallianwala Bagh massacre), Gandhi said, "We may forgive Dyer and O'Dwyer for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, but we cannot afford to forget it..."[CWMG, Vol. 45, p. 132 'Speech to Congress Leaders, Allahabad', 31st January, 1921].
Dyer did not repent his act at Jallianwala Bagh either. But once, he did consider donating the proceeds from some of his lectures "among the relatives of the Indians who fell during Amritsar affair in 1919". [The Manchester Guardian, 03rd February, 1921, 'General Dyer's Lecture Fund']. Gandhi's journal Navjivan even took note of this and said General Dyer had dared to spare the income for the victim families of Jallianwala Bagh. [Navjivan, February, 1921, p. 188]. But the idea didn't materialise. As per Manchester Guardian's report, "He (Dyer) has varied that intention and is devoting the proceeds to a fund for supplying medical aid to the wives of British officers serving in India".
Gandhi and Dyerism: Ironically, it was Gandhi who coined the term 'Dyerism' to describe brute force and violent suppression, thus making General Dyer the most referred name in that context. He described untouchability as 'Dyerism of Hindu religion'. He also drew a parallel between General Dyer's act of cruelty with murder in the name of cow protection. In response to a letter, Gandhi wrote: "General Dyer himself surely believed that English men and women were in danger of losing their lives if he did not take the measures he did. We, who know better, call it an act of cruelty and vengeance. But from General Dyer's own standpoint, he is justified. Many Hindus sincerely believe that it is a proper thing to kill a man who wants to kill a cow and he will quote scripture for his defence and many other Hindus will be found to justify his action. But strangers who do not accept the sacredness of the cow will hold it to be preposterous to kill a human being for the sake of slaying an animal". [CWMG, Vol. 33, p. 358, 'Letter to Deveshwar Siddhantalankar', 22nd May, 1927].
During the Dandi March, Gandhi came to know that some villagers were not supplying grocery or water to the police or other government officers. Gandhi said that if Dyer and O'Dwyer "whose deeds, which were the very incarnations of cruelty, I had termed as 'Dyerism', shoot me and if I am still conscious and come to know that one of them has been bitten by a snake, I would go running to them to suck out the poison. I have done such things in the past". [CWMG Vol. 43, p. 116, 21st March, 1930]. He told American journalist-historian Katherine Mayo that "I want this country to be spared Dyerism. That is, I do not want my country, when it has the power, to resort to frightfulness in order to impose her custom on others". [CWMG Vol. 30, p. 120, 'Interview to Katherine Mayo', 17th March, 1926].
-Challapalli Srinivas Chakravarthy-
---------------------------------------------------------

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

VIEWS OF MANU AND KAUTILYA ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.

The state performed its duty of protection of society and the individual through coercive enforcement of the standards of justice based on the concept of ' Dharma '. From the Vedic period onward, the perennial attitude of Indian culture had been justice and righteousness. Justice, in the Indian context, was a human expression of a wider universal principle of nature and if men were entirely true to nature, their actions would be spontaneously just. Men experienced Justice, in the sense of a distributive equity, as moral justice, social justice, and legal justice. Each of these forms of justice was viewed as a particularisation of the general principle of the universe seen as a total organism. Impartial administration of justice was always regarded as one of the main duties of the King and he was considered to be the fountain of justice. The ethical code of society and its cultural standards were inter-related. The cultural maturity and social amicability and even their det...
Read more

ARCHAEOLOGISTS DISCOVER TOMBS IN EGYPT DATING BACK 2,000 YEARS.

Egypt's antiquities ministry said on 14th August, 2017 (Tuesday) that archaeologists have discovered three tombs dating more than 2,000 years, from the Ptolemaic Period. The discovery was made in the Nile valley province of Minya south of Cairo, in an area known as al-kamin al-Sahrawi. The unearthed sarcophagi and clay fragments suggest that the area was a large necropolis from sometime between the 27th Dynasty and the Greco-Roman period. ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
Read more

ANCIENT INDIA'S LINKS TO TODAY.

You may not have heard of Shu-ilishu but he is a man of great significance. He reaches out to us from almost 4,300 years ago, through a small Akkadian cylinder seal now housed at the Louvre Museum in Paris. On the seal, you will find an image of him talking to two men. The inscription describes Shu-ilishu as the interpreter of the Meluhhan language. 'Meluha' was, in all probability, the term used by ancient Mesopotamians for the Indus Valley region, and the presence of an oficial 'interpreter' there indicates just how important the steady flow of good from the Indian sub-continent was.  Precious and vibrant lapis lazuli stones, carnelian beads, wood and even dogs would go across via old trade routes and ports like Lothal (in modern-day Gujarat) to Akkad, capital of the Akkadian Empire (03rd millennium BCE) and now in modern-day Iraq. There are also references to a settlement of Meluhhans in the city of Guabba in Sumer, in Mesopotamia.  The story of Shi-ilishu and ...
Read more