SPEAK, MEMORY.

In the mind games being played out on an increasingly splattered chessboard between intelligence agencies and terror groups, a portly, 67-year-old Professor from Bangalore could turn out to be the crucial bishop. Profeesor Mukundam Champadi Raman is the man behind a brain signature profiling technique, whose official name is Brain Electrical Oscillations (BEOS). It is now a favourite forensic tool of investigators desperate for a lead.
Professor Mukundam says the psychological logic behind BEOS is that while an individual may lie about an experience to others, he cannot lie to himself. How does it work? A specially designed auditory probe extracts a signature from the scalp of the suspect. Continuous video footage of changes in the brain is captured and integrated with the data. The examiner presents the suspect with several scenarios and probes, not merely to test his knowledge but to provoke remembrance of a past event. The suspect's mind produces results which form a pattern or signature, and latter, the entire result is processed by a computer using a special software.
In India, Gandhinagar and Mumbai have established BEOS laboratories. In 2008, the Gujarat police claimed to have cracked the Gujarat bomb blasts with the help of BEOS. Pune-based MBA students Aditi Sharma and her lover Pravin Khandelwal were found guilty for conspiring to murder a fellow student by giving him prasad laced with arsenic. Earlier in January, 2008, a supari shop employee was convicted in Mumbai for hammering a colleague to death. The supari shop employee was also taken to the forensic laboratory in Kalina.
But Mukundam is unhappy with the media going to town about it, exaggerating his achievements and 'misquoting him'. The former Head of Department of Clinical Psychology at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (NIMHANS), Bangalore, says that BEOS cannot be used to convict a person. "I believe they cannot even chargesheet a person using the findings. It is unfortunate that the facts have been misrepresented repeatedly. To my knowledge, it is used as an aid to investigation, and may be cited as corroborative evidence, but BEOS findings have never been used as primary evidence", he says in a phone interview.
Even though he downplays hysterical media reports, the Professor is quick to defend his invention. In 2007, a government committee, the Nagaraja Committee, rejected brain mapping and BEOS as unscientific. Mukundam says that the committee never visited the forensic labs where the technology is being used, and even if they had, BEOS is so complex that it needs an explanation from an expert to understand its functioning. The mind fascinates Mukundam. The Malayali Professor taught English, Science and Social Science Studies in a small school in Ochanthuruth, Kerala, for ten months after graduating in physics and mathematics from Kerala University. He went to get a Ph. D from NIMHANS in Clinical and Neuro Psychology and spent the next thirty years studying the mind at NIMHANS. In this journey, dozens of Psychiatrists and Psychologists have been his guides but the works of two persons that have influenced him the most are Bertrand Russell, who he says made him a hardcore reductionist, and Peter Senge, who made him look beyond reductionism (understanding the nature of complex things by reducing them to interactions of their parts). "It was the works of Eysenck JJ (an eminent psychologist in the 1970s and 1980s) that got me interested in experimental psychology, whereas Luria A R ( a Russian neuro-psychologist who started the school of cultural and historical psychology) got me fixed forever in neuro-psychology", he says.
His comment on the terror ripping through India is that the mind of criminals and terrorists differ from ordinary humans. Over a period of time, he says, normal humans have developed higher forms of emotions, such as love and compassion which foster social harmony, creative thinking and other related activities. "But some people (terrorists and criminals) have not given importance to the inculcation of these emotions. They develop emotions at an animal level and for them an eye for an eye theory holds true".  
(Based on an interview of Professor C.R. Mukundam published in 'The Times of India' dated 22nd September, 2008. The interviewer was Ketan Tanna).    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

VIEWS OF MANU AND KAUTILYA ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.

The state performed its duty of protection of society and the individual through coercive enforcement of the standards of justice based on the concept of ' Dharma '. From the Vedic period onward, the perennial attitude of Indian culture had been justice and righteousness. Justice, in the Indian context, was a human expression of a wider universal principle of nature and if men were entirely true to nature, their actions would be spontaneously just. Men experienced Justice, in the sense of a distributive equity, as moral justice, social justice, and legal justice. Each of these forms of justice was viewed as a particularisation of the general principle of the universe seen as a total organism. Impartial administration of justice was always regarded as one of the main duties of the King and he was considered to be the fountain of justice. The ethical code of society and its cultural standards were inter-related. The cultural maturity and social amicability and even their det...
Read more

ARCHAEOLOGISTS DISCOVER TOMBS IN EGYPT DATING BACK 2,000 YEARS.

Egypt's antiquities ministry said on 14th August, 2017 (Tuesday) that archaeologists have discovered three tombs dating more than 2,000 years, from the Ptolemaic Period. The discovery was made in the Nile valley province of Minya south of Cairo, in an area known as al-kamin al-Sahrawi. The unearthed sarcophagi and clay fragments suggest that the area was a large necropolis from sometime between the 27th Dynasty and the Greco-Roman period. ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
Read more

ANCIENT INDIA'S LINKS TO TODAY.

You may not have heard of Shu-ilishu but he is a man of great significance. He reaches out to us from almost 4,300 years ago, through a small Akkadian cylinder seal now housed at the Louvre Museum in Paris. On the seal, you will find an image of him talking to two men. The inscription describes Shu-ilishu as the interpreter of the Meluhhan language. 'Meluha' was, in all probability, the term used by ancient Mesopotamians for the Indus Valley region, and the presence of an oficial 'interpreter' there indicates just how important the steady flow of good from the Indian sub-continent was.  Precious and vibrant lapis lazuli stones, carnelian beads, wood and even dogs would go across via old trade routes and ports like Lothal (in modern-day Gujarat) to Akkad, capital of the Akkadian Empire (03rd millennium BCE) and now in modern-day Iraq. There are also references to a settlement of Meluhhans in the city of Guabba in Sumer, in Mesopotamia.  The story of Shi-ilishu and ...
Read more