FOR NOW, 'MAKEIN INDIA' IS A MERE SLOGAN.

Yet another prime ministerial visit is being accompanied by big-ticket defence purchases. This time it is in the deep winter of Moscow, and deals worth over $10 billion are expected to be finalised, bringing Russia back on the list of top defence suppliers after a break of several years. Earlier  a few hours before the Prime Minister took off for the US in September, 2015, the Cabinet Committee on Security cleared deals worth over $3 billion, approving the long pending  purchase of Apache and Chinook helicopters. The story was not very different in April in Paris, when Narendra Modi surprised many by announcing a decision to buy 36 Rafale fighters from Dassault through a government-to-government deal, overriding years of ongoing negotiations with the same company to buy 126 fighters under the MMRCA (Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft) open tender.
While the big-ticket defence purchases help improve atmospherics of the Prime Minister's high-decibel visits and military preparedness, they also raise troubling questions about the honesty behind the 'Make in India' slogan of the government. If anything, these purchases are only affirming the fact that the Modi government is only following the legacy of past several decades in defence procurements - import-dependent, risk-averse and corruption-riddled.
A missing military-industrial complex: India is probably the only large democracy without a robust military-industrial complex. According to data released earlier this year by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), India accounted for fifteen percent of the volume of global arms imports in the previous five years (2010-2015). In terms of financial value, India was only second to Saudi Arabia in 2014 on military purchases from the global bazaar, said IHS Jane's.  India's imports are three times that of China, which in the early 1990s took a dramatic turn towards indeginsation after following a pattern very similar to that of India. Between 2010 and 2014, China also turned into a major exporter of arms, increasing exports by 143 percent over the period. China is the world's third-largest military exporter today; India does not even figure in the top ten. Realists would argue that even if stolen from foreign countries and reverse-engineered, China has rapidly built itself a very robust military-industrial complex.
The Prime Minister has been pushing the Make-in India policy - especially vis-a-vis the defence sector - on his foreign trips and in speeches at home. However, his Government has committed several mistakes that have compounded to ensure that no dramatic turnaround takes place. Signifcantly, like its predecessor United Progressive Alliance Government, the Modi regime has also failed to leverage defence procurements for strategic national goals. The best leverage would have been to deploy money spent in the international bazaar into rapidly building the domestic military manufacturing base. Instead, what could have been the biddest offset provision in a foreign defence deal - whereby fifty percent of the $20 billion MMRCA deal worth would have had to be sourced from indigenous suppliers - was scuttled by the off-the-shelf Rafale purchase.
The big-ticket purchases announced in world capitals are taking away a major pie from the capital budget of the Ministry of Defence (MoD). Already, most of the capital budget is going towards committed liabilities - payment for contracts concluded in the past. In 2014-15, 93 percent of the capital budget went into committed liabilities, leaving just seven percent for new purchases. The penchant to give away major defence deals will thus also ensure that the capital budget will, for years to come, be heavily committed to previous contracts.
Pending Reforms: In the wake of Kargil conflict of 1999, among the major reforms was the efoort to end the straglehold of government-run Public Sector Units (PSUs) and the Ordinance Factory Board over military supplies, with the Indian private sector allowed entry into defence contracts. Over the years, the FDI limit has also been raised to forty-nine percent. However, none of it seems to have created enough momentum to craete a large domestic defence manufacturing base and any significant technology transfer. Larsen and Toubro (L & T) has almost 1,000 skilled engineering staff who built hulls for indigenous nuclear submarines; there are such capabilities on various fronts with various Tata Group firms such as Tata Power SED (Strategic Engineering Division), Kalyani Group, Mahindra Group, etc. But there is no clarity about how to nurture the nascent capabilities in the private sector without being seen as a crony capitalist state. There are already murmurs of protest from foreign executives about the way sections of the government are rooting for some private sector players.
Ultimately, the creation of a robust military-industrial complex would require an overhaul of higher education to create well-trained  manpower. A 10 member committee set up by the MoD in May, 2015 to evolve a policy framework for facilitating Make in India in the defence sector has come up with several recommndations. Amongst its most significant recommendations is that Make in India should not end up being "assemble in India with no Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and design control". The comment comes aginst the backdrop of what has happened to the defence sector PSUs, which have largely become local integrators for foreign systems.
A committee under Dr. AP.J. Abdul Kalam, then scientific advisor to the defence minister, had recommended that India should look at increasing its defence acquisition from within India from thirty percent to seventy percent by 2005. The years was 1995. However, today indigenous acquisition is still hovering around thirty-five percent. The MoD expert committee has now suggested that 2027 should be the target year to achieve seventy percent self-reliance.
The defence budget is thirteen percent of the Central Government's total expenditure, and almost two percent of the GDP. Discussions about guns versus butter (defence versus civilian goods) can be endless, but it would be practically stupid to wish away the meirts of an indigenous military-industrial complex, especially given its repeatedly proven ability to better lives beyond the military realm, its critically for securing the nation state, and ability to bring down corruption in purchases. For now, "Make in India" is a mere slogan.
[Based on an article written by Josy Joseph published in The Hindu Newspaper dated 24th December , 2015 (Thursday)].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

VIEWS OF MANU AND KAUTILYA ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.

The state performed its duty of protection of society and the individual through coercive enforcement of the standards of justice based on the concept of ' Dharma '. From the Vedic period onward, the perennial attitude of Indian culture had been justice and righteousness. Justice, in the Indian context, was a human expression of a wider universal principle of nature and if men were entirely true to nature, their actions would be spontaneously just. Men experienced Justice, in the sense of a distributive equity, as moral justice, social justice, and legal justice. Each of these forms of justice was viewed as a particularisation of the general principle of the universe seen as a total organism. Impartial administration of justice was always regarded as one of the main duties of the King and he was considered to be the fountain of justice. The ethical code of society and its cultural standards were inter-related. The cultural maturity and social amicability and even their det...
Read more

ARCHAEOLOGISTS DISCOVER TOMBS IN EGYPT DATING BACK 2,000 YEARS.

Egypt's antiquities ministry said on 14th August, 2017 (Tuesday) that archaeologists have discovered three tombs dating more than 2,000 years, from the Ptolemaic Period. The discovery was made in the Nile valley province of Minya south of Cairo, in an area known as al-kamin al-Sahrawi. The unearthed sarcophagi and clay fragments suggest that the area was a large necropolis from sometime between the 27th Dynasty and the Greco-Roman period. ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
Read more

ANCIENT INDIA'S LINKS TO TODAY.

You may not have heard of Shu-ilishu but he is a man of great significance. He reaches out to us from almost 4,300 years ago, through a small Akkadian cylinder seal now housed at the Louvre Museum in Paris. On the seal, you will find an image of him talking to two men. The inscription describes Shu-ilishu as the interpreter of the Meluhhan language. 'Meluha' was, in all probability, the term used by ancient Mesopotamians for the Indus Valley region, and the presence of an oficial 'interpreter' there indicates just how important the steady flow of good from the Indian sub-continent was.  Precious and vibrant lapis lazuli stones, carnelian beads, wood and even dogs would go across via old trade routes and ports like Lothal (in modern-day Gujarat) to Akkad, capital of the Akkadian Empire (03rd millennium BCE) and now in modern-day Iraq. There are also references to a settlement of Meluhhans in the city of Guabba in Sumer, in Mesopotamia.  The story of Shi-ilishu and ...
Read more